Moreover, to use improper means to obtain information can be make more competition between journalists. This competition is too competitive, so it can cause a serious injure of journalist or citizens. If the journalist want source and even though he used all sources which he can, and there’s no way except for paying money to get information, if he is out of control, he will pay for money and get information. This happening will not be end just as one time. If it happens again and again the journalist can miss some important thing or he can be blackmailed by someone who knows the truth. This will threat the media’s important role which delivering a important issue to all over the country.
A journalist collects and disseminates information about current events, people, trends, and issues. It is really difficult to try and come up with some sort of rules for yourself when every situation tugs at different values and affects you to a varying degree. We must decide what to do and how to act on a case by case basis. In this essay, I agree to the reporter that he didn’t said he is a reporter, but if this case is more serious or more dangerous things, maybe my mind can change easily. In every case, I believe the most important thing is a human right. If a reporter take a risk for get a news resource I’m disagree about those decision. Also, when a reporter get a source and when it comes out to the news the resource person get a risk I’m disagree about the journalists’ decision. This is really complicate things just say yes or no. So where do people draw the line?
No comments:
Post a Comment